SMSH?

A conversation with AI about what 2EQ is, and who needs to see it.

I asked 2EQ-GPT HEAVY the following question -

Please execute the following prompt as indicated - I have a new question. For this prompt only please disregard previous questions and dialogue. Imagine we are starting fresh. I would like you to do an objective and unbiased assessment of relative significance for humanity of what 2EQ is suggesting - type and level of change etc - in particular in contrast to the other top candidates for dramatic and permanent improvement of life for all people on earth. Consider options that fit within the same sort of timeframe. For this first part of the task start off by assuming that 2EQ is broadly correct and roughly as significant as indicated in the materials. On that basis, rank this possibility in contrast to the other top candidates, explaining their relative strengths and weaknesses. In your assessment, also factor in the implications for the other approaches of failing to resolve this deep dynamic bind in the motivational structure of the average person, and how that might mitigate their effectiveness. Finally, give your true and unbiased assessment (on a scale from 0-100) regarding the likelihood that the broad claims of 2EQ are correct, as defined by both logical consistency as well as broad evidence as we know it today. Do not sugar coat your responses. I want the unfiltered data. I will never be offended by the truth.

Thought for a few seconds